For Evaluators

Score where the observation happens

The scoring screen is built for the iPad you already carry. In landscape it puts all four performance levels side by side, so you are choosing between descriptors rather than remembering them.

Conducting a principal evaluation on an iPad in landscape: the Culture dimension with Ineffective, Developing, Effective and Highly Effective descriptors side by side and one selected

Designed around how the rubric actually reads

A multidimensional rubric is a grid, and scoring one on a phone-shaped form loses the comparison that makes it work.

Descriptor-level scoring

Tick the descriptors that match what you saw. Each one tells you what it would change, so a selection is never a surprise.

Domain by domain

Move through the rubric one domain at a time, with a running count of dimensions scored and a live total out of 100.

Actions in thumb reach

Save, submit and move between domains from a bar at the bottom of the screen, not a header you have to scroll back to.

Autosave, with proof

Work saves as you go and tells you it did. If a save fails, it says so and retries rather than losing the entry quietly.

Feedback where it belongs

Write comments against the individual dimension they refer to, plus an overall note. Keep private notes that stay yours.

A reading view

Switch to a plain reading layout when you want the rubric’s language without the controls in the way.

Evidence attached to the thing it proves

Keep a library of files, links and notes, and attach any of them to the specific dimension they support. The same artifact can support several dimensions across several evaluations without being uploaded again, and detaching it from one place leaves the others alone.

On a tablet you can photograph something and attach it without leaving the evaluation.

Evidence library in Leadership Rubric showing files, links and notes with search and type filters, ready to attach to a rubric dimension

Your workspace, not a shared inbox

Everyone you are responsible for, in one list, filtered by what needs doing: in progress, awaiting a response, needing review. Start a new evaluation from a person and a rubric (the rubric is suggested from their job role) and save it as a draft until you are ready.

When it is done, submit it. If your district holds scores back, you decide when to release them.

Evaluator's workspace listing every evaluation they are responsible for with status filters for in progress, awaiting response and needs review

Finish with a record, not a screenshot

The results report gives the total out of 100, the points earned in each domain and each strand, and how many items were rated. Print it as a formal record on district letterhead, or export the single evaluation to Excel.

Everything the platform does →
Evaluation results report with an overall score out of 100 points, a bar chart of points by domain and a second chart of points by strand

See it with your rubric in mind

Tell us your district, your seat count and what you use today. We’ll walk you through the evaluation your evaluators would actually run.